The cost of excluding particle contamination is relative to the cost of removing it from the oil once it gets in?

The cost of excluding particle contamination is considered to be higher than the cost of removing it from the oil once it has entered because prevention is often seen as a more significant investment. Implementing effective filtration and contamination control measures can require substantial upfront expenditures in terms of equipment, technology, and processes. This also includes regular maintenance and monitoring to ensure that these systems operate efficiently.

On the other hand, while removing contamination after it has occurred is certainly necessary, it typically involves more reactive measures that can disrupt operations and lead to unscheduled downtime, which can be costly. The expenses associated with cleaning, replacing oil, and potential damage to machinery often accumulate, making for a far more expensive course of action than investing in prevention strategies.

Consequently, organizations often find that investing in preventive measures yields better long-term financial outcomes by lowering the likelihood of contamination-related issues and extending the life of machinery. This proactive approach is aimed at maintaining system productivity and integrity while avoiding costly repairs and replacements that may follow from unresolved contamination problems.